Sample Report — This is what every Full Scan produces
Get your own scanTrue Form X
male · 34y · 175cm · 65kg · athletic performance
April 16, 2026
True Form Rating
Alex Rivera
Your Archetype
The Willow Branch
This athlete possesses excellent lower-body mobility and a naturally lean frame, allowing them to bend and adapt into deep ranges of motion with solid balance. However, significant deficits in maximal strength, explosive power, and core stability prevent them from snapping back with true athletic force.
Athletic Age
29
5yr younger than actual
Exceptional foundational stability and lower-body mechanics, hindered by poor reactive power and upper-body mobility restrictions.
Alex Rivera is a 34-year-old male with one year of consistent training who possesses excellent foundational stability, lean body composition, and strong lower-body movement mechanics. However, compared to typical athletes pursuing performance goals, his explosive power (RSI of 1.07) and upper-body mobility are significantly lagging. To truly optimize his athletic potential, his programming must shift from basic movement competency toward rapid-response plyometrics, correcting his swayback posture, and addressing severe thoracic asymmetries.
Badges earned
Posture Grade
B+
Mobility Grade
B+
Strength Grade
F
Power Grade
D+
Neuro Grade
B+
Your key metrics vs. reference ranges for active adults your age and sex.
Body Fat %
ref: 8–18 %
BMI
ref: 18.5–25 kg/m²
FFMI
ref: 18–25 kg/m²
Waist-to-Height
ref: 0.35–0.5 ratio
Waist-to-Hip
ref: 0.75–0.9 ratio
Head Forward
ref: 0–5 cm
Vertical Jump
ref: 35–60 cm
Mobility Score
ref: 60–90 /100
Symmetry Score
ref: 90–100 /100
Resting Heart Rate
ref: 50–80 bpm
Est. VO2max
ref: 40–55 ml/kg/min
Power-to-Weight
ref: 0.4–0.7 cm/kg
Peak Power (Sayers)
ref: 3000–5000 W
Population Percentiles
Welcome back to your follow-up assessment, Alex Rivera. As a thirty-four-year-old athlete who has dedicated the past year to training five days a week, you have built a truly exceptional foundation. Reviewing your latest scan, it is clear that your consistency is paying off, particularly in your lower-body movement mechanics and lean body composition. You possess an outstanding level of single-leg stability and neuromuscular control, evidenced by a highly refined balance system that shows no notable compensations like hip drop or arm flailing. Your lateral symmetry is excellent, and your baseline body composition, with an estimated 14.5 percent body fat at 65 kilograms, provides a fantastic canvas for optimizing your power-to-weight ratio. However, as we shift your focus toward true athletic performance, we need to look beyond basic movement competency. Your explosive power, reactive strength, and upper-body mobility are currently lagging behind your foundational stability. To unlock your full athletic potential, we need to address specific postural deviations, severe thoracic asymmetries, and sluggish plyometric responses that are currently acting as emergency brakes on your performance. Before we dive into the biomechanics, we must address the integrity of the data collected in this follow-up scan. While your left-side balance sway scored an impressive 80 out of 100, the lack of right-side balance data prevents a crucial asymmetry analysis. In athletic performance, bilateral symmetry is vital for identifying injury risks and ensuring balanced power transfer during dynamic movements like sprinting or cutting. Furthermore, we recorded zero attempts for your reaction time, and your strength telemetry displayed severe anomalies, such as recording one-kilogram loads for both the back squat and bench press with extremely slow concentric phases. Your resting heart rate of 58 beats per minute is excellent, but the brief fifteen-second measurement duration and low confidence metric severely compromise its reliability. Moving forward, it is imperative that we capture a complete, clean scan with proper loads and full-duration vital readings. Accurate data is the compass that guides our programming, and to truly tailor your five-day-a-week regimen, we need a complete picture of your central nervous system's processing speed and actual force production. Looking closely at your postural alignment, we uncovered significant structural patterns that are directly impacting your athletic mechanics. You present with a swayback posture, characterized by a severe posterior pelvic tilt of 182.3 degrees. This posterior tilt causes a forward translation of your hips and flattens out both your lumbar lordosis, measured at 179 degrees, and your thoracic kyphosis, measured at 178.7 degrees. In a healthy athlete, the natural S-curve of the spine acts as a coiled spring, absorbing shock during high-impact activities like jumping and running. By flattening these curves, your spine loses its natural shock-absorbing capacity, forcing your joints to take the brunt of the impact. This postural deviation is compounded by bilateral knee hyperextension, also known as genu recurvatum, and a mild forward head posture of negative 2.8 centimeters. A posterior pelvic tilt typically indicates tight hamstrings and underactive hip flexors, a combination that directly inhibits your explosive lower-body power, ruins your sprinting mechanics, and prevents you from achieving the optimal hip extension required for peak athletic performance. This compromised postural foundation severely restricts your upper-body mobility, which is currently your most significant physical limiter. Your scan reveals a severe thoracic rotation asymmetry, with only 33 degrees of rotation to the left compared to 90 degrees to the right. This massive discrepancy, combined with poor bilateral shoulder reach scores driven by restricted internal rotation, creates a dangerous bottleneck for power transfer. We can see the real-world consequences of this during your overhead squat assessment. While you achieve excellent full depth in your lower body, your upper body compensates heavily. Your elbows flex markedly, and your trunk leans forward because you simply lack the shoulder flexion and thoracic extension required to maintain an upright, overhead position. If we do not correct this asymmetry, you are at a high risk for shoulder impingement and lower back compensation during any overhead or rotational athletic movements. Moving down the kinetic chain, we also observe compensations in your lower extremities that are bleeding your power. During your deep squat, you exhibit a noticeable heel lift and a forward weight shift, which points directly to restricted ankle dorsiflexion. Additionally, we noted knee valgus, or an inward caving of the knees, during the descent and ascent of your overhead squat. This medial knee collapse suggests underactivity in your hip abductors and gluteals. Furthermore, while your hamstring flexibility appears functional on paper, with straight leg raise scores of 79.5 degrees on the left and 83.1 degrees on the right, your pelvis rotates significantly during the movement. This indicates a lack of core stability and an inability to dissociate your hip movement from your lumbopelvic complex, meaning your core is not currently strong enough to anchor your lower body during dynamic leg swings or sprints. All of these structural, mobility, and stability factors culminate in your power output, which is currently below average for an athlete of your age and training background. Your best vertical jump was 32 centimeters, but the most telling metrics are your low Reactive Strength Index of 1.07 and your prolonged time to takeoff of 1449 milliseconds. These numbers reveal a highly force-dominant profile with a sluggish amortization phase. In simple terms, when you drop down to jump, you spend far too much time at the bottom, failing to efficiently translate the eccentric loading of your muscles into an explosive concentric upward output. Your stiff landing mechanics, driven by your flattened spinal curves and restricted ankles, limit your ability to absorb force safely. Furthermore, your severe thoracic and shoulder tightness results in an abbreviated arm swing, robbing you of the upward momentum that a powerful arm drive provides. You have the raw strength and the lean frame, but your nervous system and connective tissues are not currently trained to store and release elastic energy rapidly. To transform you from a stable lifter into a powerful athlete, I have designed a four-week Foundational Athletic Power and Corrective Phase that you will execute five days a week. Day one focuses on lower body strength and landing mechanics, utilizing box jumps and altitude drops to teach your body how to absorb force safely, alongside ankle mobilizations and banded lateral walks to fix your heel lift and knee valgus. Day two targets your upper body and thoracic mobility, using quadruped rotations and prone Y-raises to aggressively attack that severe left-to-right asymmetry and restore your overhead reach. Day three is dedicated to active recovery, core stability, and correctives, employing bird dogs, dead bugs, and hip flexor isometrics to pull your pelvis out of that posterior tilt and restore your spinal curves. Day four is where we build your explosive engine, utilizing rapid-response pogo jumps to drastically reduce your ground contact time and improve your Reactive Strength Index, paired with Bulgarian split squats to build unilateral power. Finally, day five integrates your upper body and trunk, using wall angels and loaded carries to reinforce a strong, upright posture. Alex Rivera, you have done an incredible job building a lean, stable, and consistent foundation over the past year. The hard work of establishing a routine and building basic movement competency is already behind you. The next four weeks are entirely about rewiring your mechanics, restoring your spinal curves, and teaching your nervous system to fire with explosive intent. By addressing your thoracic asymmetries and shifting your pelvic alignment, you will instantly unlock a more powerful arm swing and a more efficient jump. Commit to the mobility work with the same intensity you bring to your strength training, and ensure you come back for your next scan ready to capture a complete, high-quality data set. I am highly confident that by our four-week rescan, we will see a significant jump in your Reactive Strength Index, a reduction in your postural compensations, and a much more explosive, resilient athletic profile.
Thoracic rotation asymmetry (33° left vs 90° right), bilateral 1/3 shoulder reach scores with restricted internal rotation, elbow flexion and arms falling forward in overhead squat, and mild forward head posture (-2.8cm).
Posterior pelvic tilt (182.3°), flattened thoracic (178.7°) and lumbar (179°) curves, forward translation of the pelvis, and noticeable pelvic rotation with the non-moving leg lifting off the floor during bilateral Straight Leg Raises.
Noticeable heel lift and weight shift to toes at the bottom of the deep squat, stiff landing in jump video analysis (score 60/100), and a prolonged time to takeoff (1449ms) with a low RSI (1.07).
Noticeable knee valgus (knees caving in) during the descent and ascent of the overhead squat, and a sluggish transition between descent and ascent ('muted hip') during the vertical jump.
Alex Rivera's resting heart rate of 58 bpm is excellent for a 34-year-old male with one year of consistent training, suggesting strong cardiovascular efficiency conducive to his athletic performance goals. However, the extremely low confidence metric of 23% and the brief 15-second measurement duration severely compromise the reliability of these readings. Furthermore, the recorded respiratory rate of 28 breaths per minute is abnormally high for a resting state compared to the normative 12-20 bpm range, which could indicate acute physiological stress, under-recovery, or a measurement artifact. Given that this is a follow-up scan, it is highly recommended to retake the assessment for a full 60 seconds while completely still to ensure accurate data before making any training adjustments.
58
Resting BPM
Pulse Waveform
49.9
Est. VO₂max (ml/kg/min)
Based on resting HR of 58 bpm
Alex Rivera Alex Rivera's estimated VO2max of 49.9 ml/kg/min is excellent, providing a highly efficient aerobic engine for a 34-year-old pursuing athletic performance. This strong cardiovascular baseline, supported by a resting HR of 58 bpm, means he can sustain high-intensity efforts longer and recover faster between explosive bursts.
Alex Rivera, at 34 years old and 65kg, your body composition reveals a solid foundation for athletic performance, highlighted by an exceptional symmetry score of 97.4/100. Your body fat percentage of 16.5% and waist-to-hip ratio of 0.87 are healthy, though optimizing closer to the 12-15% body fat range could further enhance your power-to-weight ratio. With a lean mass of 54.3kg and a BMI of 21.2, you are relatively Photo-verified body fat estimate: 14.5% (confidence: low). The subject is wearing baggy black clothing, which has caused the 2D pose estimation to fail completely, resulting in physically impossible circumference measurements. Body fat is adjusted up to a more realistic level for a slim male, though confidence is low due to the attire. Muscle mass level: below_average. Fat distribution: Indeterminate due to loose clothing, but appears generally lean..
Body Fat
16.5%
BMI
21.2
Lean Mass
60.3kg
Fat Mass
4.7kg
Waist/Hip
1.25
Symmetry
97.4/100
Waist-to-Height
0.469
Excellent — below 0.5 is the health sweet spot
Overall: 16.5% body fat
L/R Symmetry
Estimated from pose landmarks + depth analysis
Waist/Hip
1.23
Shoulder/Waist
1.04
Alex Rivera, your follow-up posture scan yields a solid score of 80/100, which is above average for a 34-year-old male with one year of dedicated training, though specific sagittal plane deviations require attention to optimize your athletic performance. We observe a mild forward head posture of -2.8cm and a head tilt of -6.7°, which can limit cervical rotation and upper-body kinetic chain efficiency during dynamic movements. The most significant finding is your posterior pelvic tilt of 182.3°, which flattens your lumbar lordosis (179°) and thoracic kyphosis (178.7°), potentially compromising your spine's natural shock-absorbing capacity during high-impact activities. This posterior tilt typically indicates tight hamstrings and underactive hip flexors, directly inhibiting your explosive lower-body power, sprinting mechanics, and ability to achieve optimal hip extension. Fortunately, your lateral symmetry is excellent, with minimal knee valgus (0.2°) and negligible hip height difference (0.2cm), meaning our primary focus should be on stretching the posterior chain and strengthening the hip flexors to restore a neutral pelvis. The subject presents with a swayback postural alignment, characterized by a posterior pelvic tilt, forward translation of the hips, and flattened thoracic and lumbar spinal curves. This is compounded by a moderate forward head position (which the algorithm underestimated) and noticeable knee hyperextension. Furthermore, the active external rotation of the arms suggests the subject is not in a completely relaxed, natural stance, which limits the accuracy of the upper extremity assessment. Additional findings from photo review: Significant bilateral knee hyperextension (genu recurvatum) clearly visible in the sagittal view.; Forward translation of the pelvis relative to the lateral malleolus (ankles), indicative of a swayback posture.; Flattened thoracic and lumbar spinal curves (flat back presentation) accompanying the posterior pelvic tilt.; Subject is actively externally rotating his arms (palms facing forward) in the frontal view rather than holding a natural resting posture, which obscures true resting shoulder protraction..
Postural Deviations (Side View)
Head Forward
-2.8cm
Shoulder Protraction
-1.3°
Pelvic Tilt
182.3° posterior
Shoulder Height Diff
1cm
Knee Valgus
0.2°
Head Tilt
6.7°
Head Forward
-2.8cm
Shoulder Protraction
-1.3°
Pelvic Tilt
182.3° posterior
Shoulder Height Diff
-1cm
Knee Valgus
0.2°
Head Tilt
-6.7°
Alex Rivera presents a solid baseline mobility score of 83/100, but detailed video analysis reveals underlying compensations that will hinder his athletic performance goals. His primary limitations are in the upper body, highlighted by a severe thoracic rotation asymmetry (33° left versus 90° right) and poor shoulder reach scores (1/3 bilaterally) driven by restricted internal rotation. While he achieves 3/3 on his squat assessments, the video analysis exposes knee valgus, a pronounced forward trunk lean in the overhead squat (LLM score 48/100), and heel lift in the deep squat. Furthermore, his hamstring flexibility is functional (SLR 79.5° left, 83.1° right), but pelvic rotation during the movement suggests a lack of core stability and hip dissociation. For a 34-year-old male with one year of training, addressing these core stability deficits and upper-body asymmetries is critical to safely transferring power and preventing injury during dynamic athletic movements Squat depth: full. The athlete demonstrates excellent lower body mechanics, achieving a full depth squat with heels flat on the floor and an upright torso. However, a significant upper body compensation is visible: the elbows are markedly flexed rather than fully extended, indicating a lack of shoulder flexion mobility to maintain the overhead position. Additional compensations observed: elbow_flexion_overhead; limited_shoulder_flexion.
Mobility Screening Matrix
Aggregations across loading conditions — the same biomechanic measured static, then under unilateral load, then in cyclic gait. The dynamic readings are the ones that actually predict injury and performance; static screens alone routinely understate risk.
Worst: Thoracic rotation — 63.3% L–R. Address with unilateral strength work and re-test in 6 weeks.
Each pillar scored 0–3 (FMS convention). Hover a number for the reason. Weakest link: Shoulder mobility — left — Combined shoulder flexion + internal rotation.
Alex Rivera's best vertical jump of 32cm and peak velocity of 2.506 m/s indicate a baseline level of power that is slightly below average for a 34-year-old male pursuing athletic performance. His force-dominant profile and low Reactive Strength Index (1.07), combined with a prolonged time to takeoff (1449ms), reveal a sluggish amortization phase where he struggles to efficiently translate eccentric loading into explosive concentric output. Positively, he demonstrates excellent landing symmetry (97-99%) and solid hip-dominant countermovement depth with decent triple extension. However, his mechanics are hindered by an abbreviated arm swing and a stiff landing that limits force absorption and increases joint stress. There is also significant inconsistency across attempts, highlighted by a severe drop-off in Jump 2 (9.1cm), suggesting a need for better motor control and intent. To improve his athletic performance, training should focus on rapid-response plyometrics to enhance elastic energy transfer, aggressive arm swing mechanics, and proper force absorption during landings.
Best Jump
32cm
Peak Velocity
2.506m/s
Landing Symmetry
97%
Power/Weight
0.49
W/kg
Even force-velocity profile. Optimize both for maximum output.
Alex Rivera's current strength telemetry displays severe anomalies, most notably the 1kg loads recorded for both the back squat and bench press, suggesting a sensor calibration error or an unloaded drill. The back squat recorded a single rep with an extremely slow 9.18-second concentric phase (0.03m/s mean velocity) and an 89% velocity drop, which provides no usable data for athletic performance profiling. Furthermore, the bench press data presents a mathematical contradiction by reporting 215W of mean power with a 1kg load at 0.333m/s, indicating the tracking system is likely applying a hidden default weight. For a 34-year-old male with 1 year of consistent training, true athletic performance metrics require testing with moderate-to-heavy loads to measure actual force production. I strongly advise recalibrating the telemetry equipment and retesting with standard loads to establish a valid baseline for his programming. Video-verified form analysis: back_squat: Athlete is performing bodyweight squats (air squats) rather than barbell back squats.; Depth is consistently at or slightly below parallel across all reps.; Neutral spine is maintained throughout the entire range of motion.; There is a noticeable forward torso lean, but the athlete's center of mass appears to remain balanced over the mid-foot, and heels stay planted. (video form score: 85/100)
Strength-to-Bodyweight
Wilks Score
1
bodyweight-adjusted strength
Load
1kg
Est. 1RM
1kg
Mean Vel.
0.33m/s
Peak Power
614W
Ecc Tempo
678ms
Pause
149ms
Con Tempo
19078ms
Load
1kg
Est. 1RM
?kg
Mean Vel.
0.03m/s
Peak Power
68W
Ecc Tempo
2112ms
Pause
1894ms
Con Tempo
9184ms
Alex Rivera, your overall neuromuscular score of 80/100 indicates a solid baseline for athletic performance, though the data set from this follow-up scan is notably incomplete. Your left-side balance sway scored an 80/100, which is slightly above average for a 34-year-old male with one year of training, suggesting good unilateral stability and proprioceptive control on that side. However, the lack of right-side balance data prevents a crucial asymmetry analysis, which is vital for identifying injury risks and ensuring balanced power transfer during dynamic athletic movements. Furthermore, with zero attempts recorded for reaction time and missing steadiness metrics, we cannot evaluate your central nervous system's processing speed or motor unit recruitment efficiency. To fully optimize your athletic performance and tailor your 5-day-a-week training regimen, it is imperative to complete a full scan to capture these missing bilateral and cognitive-motor metrics. The athlete displays outstanding neuromuscular control and single-leg stability on both sides with no notable asymmetries. The absence of significant compensations, such as hip drop or arm flailing, indicates a highly refined balance system. The algorithmic score underestimates his actual stability and warrants a positive adjustment. Compensations observed: Minor ankle micro-adjustments on the left leg.
Neuromuscular Breakdown
80
Balance
Balance Score
80/100
Stable
The severe 92.7% asymmetry in thoracic rotation (33 degrees left vs. 90 degrees right) is the most critical limiting factor for rotational power and injury prevention.
An excellent VO2max of 49.9 ml/kg/min and a resting heart rate of 58 bpm provide a robust aerobic foundation for sustained athletic performance and rapid recovery.
Structural compensations, including a posterior pelvic tilt (182.3 degrees) and bilateral knee hyperextension, threaten to compromise force absorption and lower-body explosive power transfer.
Strength metrics (Grade F) are currently invalid due to telemetry anomalies recording 1kg loads, necessitating immediate recalibration and retesting to establish true force production baselines.
A Recovery Readiness score of 76/100 paired with a Cardio Readiness of 89/100 indicates a solid systemic recovery state, though the abnormally high resting respiratory rate of 28 bpm warrants monitoring for acute physiological stress.
With an N/A Fatigue Index and severe anomalies in the strength telemetry recording 1kg loads, true neuromuscular fatigue resistance cannot be accurately assessed and requires retesting with appropriate loads.
83
/100
Compensation Chains
Thoracic rotation asymmetry → Compensatory lumbar rotation → Uneven loading during bilateral lifts
Restricted shoulder reach → Limited overhead position → Overhead squat compensation → Injury risk in pressing
Your overall movement quality is solid with a Movement Complexity of 83/100, but it is hindered by a swayback posture, a 182.3-degree posterior pelvic tilt, and significant bilateral knee hyperextension. These structural compensations, combined with limited shoulder flexion overhead, will leak power and increase joint stress during high-impact athletic performance.
33.4
Asymmetry Index
The Asymmetry Index of 33.4/100 highlights a severe 92.7% difference in thoracic rotation (33 degrees left versus 90 degrees right), which drastically impairs rotational power and upper-body kinetic chain efficiency. While lower-body asymmetries are mild, addressing this severe thoracic restriction is critical to preventing compensatory shoulder or lower back injuries during dynamic athletic movements.
100
/100
Based on 1 year of training
A Training Age Efficiency score of 100/100 demonstrates outstanding progress for just one year of consistent 5-day-a-week training. You have rapidly developed a strong aerobic base and functional mobility, effectively maximizing your initial physiological adaptation phase.
57
/100 risk score
Moderate risk — some imbalances detected. Corrective work recommended alongside training.
Shoulder impingement and lower back compensation during overhead or rotational movements due to severe thoracic rotation asymmetry (33° L vs 90° R) and poor bilateral shoulder reach.
Implement targeted thoracic mobility drills focusing on left-side rotation, and stretch the posterior shoulder capsule to improve internal rotation.
Reduced spinal shock absorption and increased risk of lower back pain during high-impact landings due to flat back posture, posterior pelvic tilt (182.3°), and knee hyperextension.
Stretch the hamstrings, strengthen the hip flexors, and practice maintaining a neutral pelvis and slight knee bend during static stance and dynamic landings.
Patellofemoral pain or ligament strain due to knee valgus observed during overhead squats combined with stiff, force-dominant jump landings.
Strengthen the gluteus medius to improve hip abduction/external rotation control, and incorporate low-level plyometrics focusing on soft, hip-dominant landings.
How prepared your profile is for each sport, based on all scan data.
Knee-to-Wall Ankle Mobilization
3 sets × 10 per leg
Keep heel flat on the floor. Drive knee forward over the 2nd/3rd toe to improve dorsiflexion.
Banded Lateral Walks
3 sets × 15 per side
Band around knees. Stay in a quarter squat, push knees out against the band to activate glute medius.
Box Jumps
4 sets × 4
Focus entirely on a soft, silent landing. Stick the landing in a strong athletic stance with zero knee valgus.
Goblet Squat
3 sets × 10-12
Elevate heels slightly if needed to maintain upright torso. Cue 'knees out' to prevent medial collapse.
Romanian Deadlift (RDL)
3 sets × 8-10
Focus on pushing hips back (hinging) rather than bending knees. Stretch the hamstrings and maintain a neutral spine.
Pallof Press
3 sets × 12 per side
Anti-rotation core stability. Keep pelvis neutral, do not let the lower back arch.
Quadruped T-Spine Rotation
3 sets × 8 per side
Perform 10-12 reps on the left side to address the severe asymmetry. Exhale on rotation.
Prone Y-Raises
3 sets × 12
Lie face down, lift arms in a 'Y' shape. Focus on lower trap activation and improving shoulder flexion.
Dumbbell Floor Press
3 sets × 10
Floor limits range of motion to protect shoulders from impingement while building horizontal pushing strength.
Single-Arm Dumbbell Row
3 sets × 10 per side
Keep torso parallel to the ground. Pull elbow to hip to engage lats and stabilize the scapula.
Half-Kneeling Landmine Press
3 sets × 8 per side
Safer vertical pressing alternative. Keep ribs down and pelvis tucked (neutral) to avoid swayback compensation.
Dead Bug
3 sets × 10 per side
Maintain lower back contact with the floor to build lumbopelvic control and correct posterior pelvic tilt.
90/90 Hip Stretch
2 sets × 60s hold per side
Focus on deep breathing and opening up the hip capsules.
Half-Kneeling Hip Flexor Isometrics
3 sets × 10s holds
Drive back knee forward into the ground without moving. Strengthens underactive hip flexors to correct swayback.
Open Book Stretch
3 sets × 10 per side
Focus on opening the chest and rotating through the upper back, especially toward the left.
Bird Dog
3 sets × 10 per side
Move slowly. Do not let the lower back arch or pelvis twist. Core stability is the priority.
Active Straight Leg Raise
2 sets × 15 per leg
Keep non-working leg flat. Focus on hip dissociation without letting the pelvis tuck under.
Pogo Jumps
3 sets × 15 seconds
Rapid response plyometrics. Stiff ankles, minimal ground contact time to improve elastic energy transfer.
Altitude Drops (Drop Squats)
3 sets × 5
Step off a low box and snap into an athletic stance. Focus on rapid force absorption and preventing stiff landings.
Bulgarian Split Squat
3 sets × 8 per side
Unilateral strength. Keep front knee tracking over toes, avoid valgus collapse.
Glute Bridge with Adductor Squeeze
3 sets × 15
Squeeze a yoga block or pad between knees. Drive through heels to activate glute max without hamstring dominance.
RKC Plank
3 sets × 30 seconds
Maximum tension. Squeeze glutes and brace core. Actively pull elbows to toes to engage anterior core.
Wall Angels
3 sets × 10
Keep lower back, upper back, and head against the wall. Slide arms up to improve shoulder flexion and T-spine mobility.
Inverted Row
3 sets × 10-12
Squeeze shoulder blades together. Keep body in a straight line, avoiding hip sag.
Push-ups
3 sets × AMRAP (leave 2 in tank)
Elevate hands on a bench if needed to maintain a perfectly neutral spine. Do not let hips drop (swayback).
Farmer's Carry
3 sets × 40 meters
Heavy dumbbells. Walk tall, chest up, ribs down. Resists lateral flexion and builds postural endurance.
Hanging Knee Raises
3 sets × 10-12
Strict control, no swinging. Strengthens hip flexors and lower core to help correct pelvic tilt.
Thoracic Spine & Shoulders
Quadruped T-Spine Rotations & Wall Angels to address severe left-side restriction and poor overhead mobility.
Daily — Target: Symmetrical T-spine rotation (>70 degrees bilaterally) and improved shoulder reach.
Landing Mechanics
Altitude drops and Box Jumps focusing on soft, silent landings with proper hip/knee/ankle flexion.
2x per week — Target: Eliminate stiff landings and reduce time to takeoff in jump metrics.
Swayback Posture
Half-kneeling hip flexor isometrics and strict core bracing (Dead Bugs, RKC Planks).
3x per week — Target: Restore neutral resting pelvic tilt and eliminate knee hyperextension in stance.
Ankle Mobility
Knee-to-wall dorsiflexion mobilizations.
Daily — Target: Eliminate heel lift during deep squats.
Glute Activation
Banded lateral walks and cueing 'knees out' during all squatting/landing movements.
During all warm-ups — Target: Zero knee valgus observed during overhead squats and jump landings.
Calorie summary
1543
BMR
2121
TDEE
2121
Target
Macros
Activity level
×1.38
AI narrative
Welcome back, Alex Rivera, for your follow-up assessment. At 65kg with a solid body fat percentage of 16.5% and excellent symmetry, your baseline is primed for your goal of maximizing athletic performance. Based on your lightly active daily routine and your 5 days per week training schedule, your Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) sits at 1543 kcal/day. Factoring in your activity level, your Total Daily Energy Expenditure (TDEE) is 2121 kcal/day. To optimize your performance and recovery without unwanted weight gain, we are targeting a maintenance intake of exactly 2121 kcal/day (+0 kcal vs TDEE).
To fuel your workouts and maintain your 54.3kg of lean mass, we have precisely structured your macronutrients. Carbohydrates will be your primary energy source, set at 280 g/day (52.8% of calories). This ensures your glycogen stores remain full for high-intensity efforts, utilizing complex sources like oats, rice, and sweet potatoes. Protein is set at 104 g/day (19.6% of calories) to facilitate muscle repair, sourced from lean chicken, whey, and Greek yogurt. Finally, fat is calculated at 65 g/day (27.6% of calories) to support hormonal balance and joint health, incorporating nutrient-dense foods like avocados, walnuts, and olive oil.
Nutrient timing and hydration are critical for a 5-day training week. Aim to consume a carbohydrate-rich meal, like your morning oats and banana, about 1-2 hours pre-workout to provide sustained energy. Post-workout, prioritize a fast-digesting protein and carbohydrate combination—such as whey protein and rice cakes—within 45 minutes to kickstart recovery. Hydration should not be overlooked; aim for at least 3 liters of water daily, adding an electrolyte supplement on your most intense training days. Additionally, you might consider a daily 5g dose of creatine monohydrate to further enhance explosive power and overall athletic performance.
Suggested daily diet
Recommended rescan in
4 weeks
Target: May 14, 2026