Sample Report — This is what every Full Scan produces

Get your own scan

True Form X

Alex Rivera

male · 34y · 175cm · 65kg · athletic performance

April 16, 2026

60True Form

Attribute Ratings

60

True Form Rating

Alex Rivera

Power63Strength37Agility73Physique66Technique69Endurance63
Power63
Explosiveness
48
Vertical Force
70
Sprint Burst
70
Strength37
Strength
19
Endurance
45
Stability
46
Agility73
Mobility
66
Balance
74
Coordination
78
Physique66
Body Composition
55
Posture
72
Recovery
71
Technique69
Form Quality
67
Movement Economy
75
Symmetry
66
Endurance63
Cardio Fitness
79
Fatigue Resistance
67
Work Capacity
42

Your Archetype

The Willow Branch

This athlete possesses excellent lower-body mobility and a naturally lean frame, allowing them to bend and adapt into deep ranges of motion with solid balance. However, significant deficits in maximal strength, explosive power, and core stability prevent them from snapping back with true athletic force.

Athletic Age

Athletic Age

29

5yr younger than actual

Actual
34
Athletic
29
Body Comp
41

Executive Summary

Exceptional foundational stability and lower-body mechanics, hindered by poor reactive power and upper-body mobility restrictions.

Alex Rivera is a 34-year-old male with one year of consistent training who possesses excellent foundational stability, lean body composition, and strong lower-body movement mechanics. However, compared to typical athletes pursuing performance goals, his explosive power (RSI of 1.07) and upper-body mobility are significantly lagging. To truly optimize his athletic potential, his programming must shift from basic movement competency toward rapid-response plyometrics, correcting his swayback posture, and addressing severe thoracic asymmetries.

Top Strengths

  • +Outstanding neuromuscular control and single-leg stability, evidenced by a highly refined balance system with no notable compensations.
  • +Excellent lower-body movement mechanics and lateral symmetry, demonstrated by full-depth squats, 97-99% landing symmetry, and minimal knee valgus (0.2°).
  • +Lean baseline body composition with an estimated 14.5% body fat and exceptional bilateral symmetry (97.4/100), providing a solid foundation for power-to-weight optimization.

Top Limiters

  • !Poor reactive strength and explosive power, highlighted by a low Reactive Strength Index (1.07), prolonged time to takeoff (1449ms), and a below-average 32cm vertical jump.
  • !Significant upper-body mobility restrictions, specifically a severe thoracic rotation asymmetry (33° left vs 90° right) and limited shoulder flexion during overhead movements.
  • !Swayback postural alignment characterized by a posterior pelvic tilt (182.3°), flattened spinal curves, and bilateral knee hyperextension (genu recurvatum).

Achievements

Badges earned

First Scan
Lean Machine
Symmetry King

Score Breakdown

Body Comp
55
Posture
72
Mobility
64
Power
64
Strength
10
Neuro
92

Posture Grade

B+

Mobility Grade

B+

Strength Grade

F

Power Grade

D+

Neuro Grade

B+

Diagnostics Panel

Your key metrics vs. reference ranges for active adults your age and sex.

lownormalhighcritical

Body Fat %

ref: 818 %

16.5%
normal

BMI

ref: 18.525 kg/m²

21.2kg/m²
normal

FFMI

ref: 1825 kg/m²

17.7kg/m²
normal

Waist-to-Height

ref: 0.350.5 ratio

0.199ratio
low

Waist-to-Hip

ref: 0.750.9 ratio

1.25ratio
critical

Head Forward

ref: 05 cm

-2.8cm
normal

Vertical Jump

ref: 3560 cm

32cm
normal

Mobility Score

ref: 6090 /100

83/100
normal

Symmetry Score

ref: 90100 /100

97.4/100
high

Resting Heart Rate

ref: 5080 bpm

58bpm
normal

Est. VO2max

ref: 4055 ml/kg/min

49.9ml/kg/min
normal

Power-to-Weight

ref: 0.40.7 cm/kg

0.49cm/kg
normal

Peak Power (Sayers)

ref: 30005000 W

2832W
normal

Population Percentiles

Population Percentiles

Overall45th %ile
Body Fat75th %ile
Mobility60th %ile
Jump Height30th %ile

Detailed Analysis

Welcome back to your follow-up assessment, Alex Rivera. As a thirty-four-year-old athlete who has dedicated the past year to training five days a week, you have built a truly exceptional foundation. Reviewing your latest scan, it is clear that your consistency is paying off, particularly in your lower-body movement mechanics and lean body composition. You possess an outstanding level of single-leg stability and neuromuscular control, evidenced by a highly refined balance system that shows no notable compensations like hip drop or arm flailing. Your lateral symmetry is excellent, and your baseline body composition, with an estimated 14.5 percent body fat at 65 kilograms, provides a fantastic canvas for optimizing your power-to-weight ratio. However, as we shift your focus toward true athletic performance, we need to look beyond basic movement competency. Your explosive power, reactive strength, and upper-body mobility are currently lagging behind your foundational stability. To unlock your full athletic potential, we need to address specific postural deviations, severe thoracic asymmetries, and sluggish plyometric responses that are currently acting as emergency brakes on your performance. Before we dive into the biomechanics, we must address the integrity of the data collected in this follow-up scan. While your left-side balance sway scored an impressive 80 out of 100, the lack of right-side balance data prevents a crucial asymmetry analysis. In athletic performance, bilateral symmetry is vital for identifying injury risks and ensuring balanced power transfer during dynamic movements like sprinting or cutting. Furthermore, we recorded zero attempts for your reaction time, and your strength telemetry displayed severe anomalies, such as recording one-kilogram loads for both the back squat and bench press with extremely slow concentric phases. Your resting heart rate of 58 beats per minute is excellent, but the brief fifteen-second measurement duration and low confidence metric severely compromise its reliability. Moving forward, it is imperative that we capture a complete, clean scan with proper loads and full-duration vital readings. Accurate data is the compass that guides our programming, and to truly tailor your five-day-a-week regimen, we need a complete picture of your central nervous system's processing speed and actual force production. Looking closely at your postural alignment, we uncovered significant structural patterns that are directly impacting your athletic mechanics. You present with a swayback posture, characterized by a severe posterior pelvic tilt of 182.3 degrees. This posterior tilt causes a forward translation of your hips and flattens out both your lumbar lordosis, measured at 179 degrees, and your thoracic kyphosis, measured at 178.7 degrees. In a healthy athlete, the natural S-curve of the spine acts as a coiled spring, absorbing shock during high-impact activities like jumping and running. By flattening these curves, your spine loses its natural shock-absorbing capacity, forcing your joints to take the brunt of the impact. This postural deviation is compounded by bilateral knee hyperextension, also known as genu recurvatum, and a mild forward head posture of negative 2.8 centimeters. A posterior pelvic tilt typically indicates tight hamstrings and underactive hip flexors, a combination that directly inhibits your explosive lower-body power, ruins your sprinting mechanics, and prevents you from achieving the optimal hip extension required for peak athletic performance. This compromised postural foundation severely restricts your upper-body mobility, which is currently your most significant physical limiter. Your scan reveals a severe thoracic rotation asymmetry, with only 33 degrees of rotation to the left compared to 90 degrees to the right. This massive discrepancy, combined with poor bilateral shoulder reach scores driven by restricted internal rotation, creates a dangerous bottleneck for power transfer. We can see the real-world consequences of this during your overhead squat assessment. While you achieve excellent full depth in your lower body, your upper body compensates heavily. Your elbows flex markedly, and your trunk leans forward because you simply lack the shoulder flexion and thoracic extension required to maintain an upright, overhead position. If we do not correct this asymmetry, you are at a high risk for shoulder impingement and lower back compensation during any overhead or rotational athletic movements. Moving down the kinetic chain, we also observe compensations in your lower extremities that are bleeding your power. During your deep squat, you exhibit a noticeable heel lift and a forward weight shift, which points directly to restricted ankle dorsiflexion. Additionally, we noted knee valgus, or an inward caving of the knees, during the descent and ascent of your overhead squat. This medial knee collapse suggests underactivity in your hip abductors and gluteals. Furthermore, while your hamstring flexibility appears functional on paper, with straight leg raise scores of 79.5 degrees on the left and 83.1 degrees on the right, your pelvis rotates significantly during the movement. This indicates a lack of core stability and an inability to dissociate your hip movement from your lumbopelvic complex, meaning your core is not currently strong enough to anchor your lower body during dynamic leg swings or sprints. All of these structural, mobility, and stability factors culminate in your power output, which is currently below average for an athlete of your age and training background. Your best vertical jump was 32 centimeters, but the most telling metrics are your low Reactive Strength Index of 1.07 and your prolonged time to takeoff of 1449 milliseconds. These numbers reveal a highly force-dominant profile with a sluggish amortization phase. In simple terms, when you drop down to jump, you spend far too much time at the bottom, failing to efficiently translate the eccentric loading of your muscles into an explosive concentric upward output. Your stiff landing mechanics, driven by your flattened spinal curves and restricted ankles, limit your ability to absorb force safely. Furthermore, your severe thoracic and shoulder tightness results in an abbreviated arm swing, robbing you of the upward momentum that a powerful arm drive provides. You have the raw strength and the lean frame, but your nervous system and connective tissues are not currently trained to store and release elastic energy rapidly. To transform you from a stable lifter into a powerful athlete, I have designed a four-week Foundational Athletic Power and Corrective Phase that you will execute five days a week. Day one focuses on lower body strength and landing mechanics, utilizing box jumps and altitude drops to teach your body how to absorb force safely, alongside ankle mobilizations and banded lateral walks to fix your heel lift and knee valgus. Day two targets your upper body and thoracic mobility, using quadruped rotations and prone Y-raises to aggressively attack that severe left-to-right asymmetry and restore your overhead reach. Day three is dedicated to active recovery, core stability, and correctives, employing bird dogs, dead bugs, and hip flexor isometrics to pull your pelvis out of that posterior tilt and restore your spinal curves. Day four is where we build your explosive engine, utilizing rapid-response pogo jumps to drastically reduce your ground contact time and improve your Reactive Strength Index, paired with Bulgarian split squats to build unilateral power. Finally, day five integrates your upper body and trunk, using wall angels and loaded carries to reinforce a strong, upright posture. Alex Rivera, you have done an incredible job building a lean, stable, and consistent foundation over the past year. The hard work of establishing a routine and building basic movement competency is already behind you. The next four weeks are entirely about rewiring your mechanics, restoring your spinal curves, and teaching your nervous system to fire with explosive intent. By addressing your thoracic asymmetries and shifting your pelvic alignment, you will instantly unlock a more powerful arm swing and a more efficient jump. Commit to the mobility work with the same intensity you bring to your strength training, and ensure you come back for your next scan ready to capture a complete, high-quality data set. I am highly confident that by our four-week rescan, we will see a significant jump in your Reactive Strength Index, a reduction in your postural compensations, and a much more explosive, resilient athletic profile.

Root Cause Analysis

Compensation Chains

Thoracic rotation asymmetryCompensatory lumbar rotationUneven loading during bilateral lifts
Restricted shoulder reachLimited overhead positionOverhead squat compensationInjury risk in pressing

Thoracic Spine and Shoulder Mobility Restriction

Thoracic rotation asymmetry (33° left vs 90° right), bilateral 1/3 shoulder reach scores with restricted internal rotation, elbow flexion and arms falling forward in overhead squat, and mild forward head posture (-2.8cm).

Inability to maintain arm alignment and upright torso during overhead squatCompensatory forward head and neck movement during shoulder reachAbbreviated arm swing during vertical jump

Swayback Postural Alignment and Core Instability

Posterior pelvic tilt (182.3°), flattened thoracic (178.7°) and lumbar (179°) curves, forward translation of the pelvis, and noticeable pelvic rotation with the non-moving leg lifting off the floor during bilateral Straight Leg Raises.

Loss of lumbopelvic stability and hip dissociation during hamstring flexibility testsCompromised spinal shock absorption leading to stiff jump landingsKnee hyperextension during resting stance

Restricted Ankle Dorsiflexion

Noticeable heel lift and weight shift to toes at the bottom of the deep squat, stiff landing in jump video analysis (score 60/100), and a prolonged time to takeoff (1449ms) with a low RSI (1.07).

Heel lift and forward weight shift during deep squatsStiff landing mechanics with limited lower-extremity flexionProlonged amortization phase during plyometrics

Hip Abductor and Gluteal Underactivity

Noticeable knee valgus (knees caving in) during the descent and ascent of the overhead squat, and a sluggish transition between descent and ascent ('muted hip') during the vertical jump.

Medial knee collapse during squatting movementsPoor elastic energy transfer during the jump amortization phase

Resting Vitals

Alex Rivera's resting heart rate of 58 bpm is excellent for a 34-year-old male with one year of consistent training, suggesting strong cardiovascular efficiency conducive to his athletic performance goals. However, the extremely low confidence metric of 23% and the brief 15-second measurement duration severely compromise the reliability of these readings. Furthermore, the recorded respiratory rate of 28 breaths per minute is abnormally high for a resting state compared to the normative 12-20 bpm range, which could indicate acute physiological stress, under-recovery, or a measurement artifact. Given that this is a follow-up scan, it is highly recommended to retake the assessment for a full 60 seconds while completely still to ensure accurate data before making any training adjustments.

Resting Vitals

58

Resting BPM

Excellent23% confidence
Cardio Readiness
89

Pulse Waveform

Aerobic Capacity

49.9

Est. VO₂max (ml/kg/min)

Excellent

Based on resting HR of 58 bpm

15304560+

Alex Rivera Alex Rivera's estimated VO2max of 49.9 ml/kg/min is excellent, providing a highly efficient aerobic engine for a 34-year-old pursuing athletic performance. This strong cardiovascular baseline, supported by a resting HR of 58 bpm, means he can sustain high-intensity efforts longer and recover faster between explosive bursts.

Body Composition

Alex Rivera, at 34 years old and 65kg, your body composition reveals a solid foundation for athletic performance, highlighted by an exceptional symmetry score of 97.4/100. Your body fat percentage of 16.5% and waist-to-hip ratio of 0.87 are healthy, though optimizing closer to the 12-15% body fat range could further enhance your power-to-weight ratio. With a lean mass of 54.3kg and a BMI of 21.2, you are relatively Photo-verified body fat estimate: 14.5% (confidence: low). The subject is wearing baggy black clothing, which has caused the 2D pose estimation to fail completely, resulting in physically impossible circumference measurements. Body fat is adjusted up to a more realistic level for a slim male, though confidence is low due to the attire. Muscle mass level: below_average. Fat distribution: Indeterminate due to loose clothing, but appears generally lean..

Body Fat

16.5%

BMI

21.2

Lean Mass

60.3kg

Fat Mass

4.7kg

Waist/Hip

1.25

Symmetry

97.4/100

Fat-Free Mass Index

17.7kg/m² FFMI18th percentile
Below AvgAverageAbove AvgAthleticElite

Body Type Classification

EctomorphEcto 63% · Meso 16% · Endo 21%
EctoEndoMeso

Waist-to-Height

0.469

Excellent — below 0.5 is the health sweet spot

8.3%5.8%6%5.5%5.7%
Low
Moderate
High

Overall: 16.5% body fat

L/R Symmetry

Arm
Δ0.3cm
Thigh
Δ0.7cm
Calf
Δ0.4cm
LeftRight

Vision Body Measurements

Estimated from pose landmarks + depth analysis

Shoulder
48.8cm
Chest
60.3cm
Waist
47.0cm
Hip
38.2cm

Waist/Hip

1.23

Shoulder/Waist

1.04

Posture Analysis

Alex Rivera, your follow-up posture scan yields a solid score of 80/100, which is above average for a 34-year-old male with one year of dedicated training, though specific sagittal plane deviations require attention to optimize your athletic performance. We observe a mild forward head posture of -2.8cm and a head tilt of -6.7°, which can limit cervical rotation and upper-body kinetic chain efficiency during dynamic movements. The most significant finding is your posterior pelvic tilt of 182.3°, which flattens your lumbar lordosis (179°) and thoracic kyphosis (178.7°), potentially compromising your spine's natural shock-absorbing capacity during high-impact activities. This posterior tilt typically indicates tight hamstrings and underactive hip flexors, directly inhibiting your explosive lower-body power, sprinting mechanics, and ability to achieve optimal hip extension. Fortunately, your lateral symmetry is excellent, with minimal knee valgus (0.2°) and negligible hip height difference (0.2cm), meaning our primary focus should be on stretching the posterior chain and strengthening the hip flexors to restore a neutral pelvis. The subject presents with a swayback postural alignment, characterized by a posterior pelvic tilt, forward translation of the hips, and flattened thoracic and lumbar spinal curves. This is compounded by a moderate forward head position (which the algorithm underestimated) and noticeable knee hyperextension. Furthermore, the active external rotation of the arms suggests the subject is not in a completely relaxed, natural stance, which limits the accuracy of the upper extremity assessment. Additional findings from photo review: Significant bilateral knee hyperextension (genu recurvatum) clearly visible in the sagittal view.; Forward translation of the pelvis relative to the lateral malleolus (ankles), indicative of a swayback posture.; Flattened thoracic and lumbar spinal curves (flat back presentation) accompanying the posterior pelvic tilt.; Subject is actively externally rotating his arms (palms facing forward) in the frontal view rather than holding a natural resting posture, which obscures true resting shoulder protraction..

Postural Deviations (Side View)

ideal179° kyphosis182.3° posterior

Head Forward

-2.8cm

Shoulder Protraction

-1.3°

Pelvic Tilt

182.3° posterior

Shoulder Height Diff

1cm

Knee Valgus

0.2°

Head Tilt

6.7°

Head Forward

-2.8cm

Shoulder Protraction

-1.3°

Pelvic Tilt

182.3° posterior

Shoulder Height Diff

-1cm

Knee Valgus

0.2°

Head Tilt

-6.7°

Head position: -2.8cm forwardMild forward head position — monitor and stretch upper traps.
Pelvic tilt: 182.3° posteriorPosterior pelvic tilt — stretch hamstrings, work on hip flexor strength.

Mobility Screening

Alex Rivera presents a solid baseline mobility score of 83/100, but detailed video analysis reveals underlying compensations that will hinder his athletic performance goals. His primary limitations are in the upper body, highlighted by a severe thoracic rotation asymmetry (33° left versus 90° right) and poor shoulder reach scores (1/3 bilaterally) driven by restricted internal rotation. While he achieves 3/3 on his squat assessments, the video analysis exposes knee valgus, a pronounced forward trunk lean in the overhead squat (LLM score 48/100), and heel lift in the deep squat. Furthermore, his hamstring flexibility is functional (SLR 79.5° left, 83.1° right), but pelvic rotation during the movement suggests a lack of core stability and hip dissociation. For a 34-year-old male with one year of training, addressing these core stability deficits and upper-body asymmetries is critical to safely transferring power and preventing injury during dynamic athletic movements Squat depth: full. The athlete demonstrates excellent lower body mechanics, achieving a full depth squat with heels flat on the floor and an upright torso. However, a significant upper body compensation is visible: the elbows are markedly flexed rather than fully extended, indicating a lack of shoulder flexion mobility to maintain the overhead position. Additional compensations observed: elbow_flexion_overhead; limited_shoulder_flexion.

AnkleHipThoracicShoulderHamstringStability

Mobility Screening Matrix

LR
Overhead Squat
3/3
Deep Squat
3/3
SLR
3
3
Shoulder Reach
1
1
Balance
3
3
Thoracic Rotation
3 — Full2 — Partial1 — Limited0 — Fail

Cross-Stage Profiles

Aggregations across loading conditions — the same biomechanic measured static, then under unilateral load, then in cyclic gait. The dynamic readings are the ones that actually predict injury and performance; static screens alone routinely understate risk.

Movement Symmetry Index

Asymmetric
16.9%mean across 4axes · ≤5% symmetric · >10% red flag
One or more axes exceed the 10% non-contact-injury threshold.
Thoracic rotation
63.3%
Hamstring SLR ROM
4.3%
Shoulder reach
0.0%
Single-leg balance (mobility)
0.0%

Worst: Thoracic rotation 63.3% L–R. Address with unilateral strength work and re-test in 6 weeks.

Functional Movement Composite

FMS-lite
14/ 18(78%)
Above the conventional 14/21 ready-to-load threshold.
Overhead squat3
Deep squat3
Active SLR — left3
Active SLR — right3
Shoulder mobility — left1
Shoulder mobility — right1

Each pillar scored 0–3 (FMS convention). Hover a number for the reason. Weakest link: Shoulder mobility — leftCombined shoulder flexion + internal rotation.

Power & Explosiveness

Alex Rivera's best vertical jump of 32cm and peak velocity of 2.506 m/s indicate a baseline level of power that is slightly below average for a 34-year-old male pursuing athletic performance. His force-dominant profile and low Reactive Strength Index (1.07), combined with a prolonged time to takeoff (1449ms), reveal a sluggish amortization phase where he struggles to efficiently translate eccentric loading into explosive concentric output. Positively, he demonstrates excellent landing symmetry (97-99%) and solid hip-dominant countermovement depth with decent triple extension. However, his mechanics are hindered by an abbreviated arm swing and a stiff landing that limits force absorption and increases joint stress. There is also significant inconsistency across attempts, highlighted by a severe drop-off in Jump 2 (9.1cm), suggesting a need for better motor control and intent. To improve his athletic performance, training should focus on rapid-response plyometrics to enhance elastic energy transfer, aggressive arm swing mechanics, and proper force absorption during landings.

Best Jump

32cm

Peak Velocity

2.506m/s

Landing Symmetry

97%

Power/Weight

0.49

W/kg

Balanced

Even force-velocity profile. Optimize both for maximum output.

#132.0cm2.51m/s97% sym
#29.1cm1.34m/s96% sym
#324.7cm2.20m/s99% sym

Strength Assessment

Alex Rivera's current strength telemetry displays severe anomalies, most notably the 1kg loads recorded for both the back squat and bench press, suggesting a sensor calibration error or an unloaded drill. The back squat recorded a single rep with an extremely slow 9.18-second concentric phase (0.03m/s mean velocity) and an 89% velocity drop, which provides no usable data for athletic performance profiling. Furthermore, the bench press data presents a mathematical contradiction by reporting 215W of mean power with a 1kg load at 0.333m/s, indicating the tracking system is likely applying a hidden default weight. For a 34-year-old male with 1 year of consistent training, true athletic performance metrics require testing with moderate-to-heavy loads to measure actual force production. I strongly advise recalibrating the telemetry equipment and retesting with standard loads to establish a valid baseline for his programming. Video-verified form analysis: back_squat: Athlete is performing bodyweight squats (air squats) rather than barbell back squats.; Depth is consistently at or slightly below parallel across all reps.; Neutral spine is maintained throughout the entire range of motion.; There is a noticeable forward torso lean, but the athlete's center of mass appears to remain balanced over the mid-foot, and heels stay planted. (video form score: 85/100)

Strength-to-Bodyweight

Bench0.02x BW
0.5x1.0x1.5x2.0x2.5x

Wilks Score

1

bodyweight-adjusted strength

bench press

Load

1kg

Est. 1RM

1kg

Mean Vel.

0.33m/s

Peak Power

614W

Ecc Tempo

678ms

Pause

149ms

Con Tempo

19078ms

Velocity Drop0.0%

back squat

Load

1kg

Est. 1RM

?kg

Mean Vel.

0.03m/s

Peak Power

68W

Ecc Tempo

2112ms

Pause

1894ms

Con Tempo

9184ms

Velocity Drop89.0%
Form Score (Video Analysis)85/100
85
Rep 1
85
Rep 2
85
Rep 3

Balance Assessment

Alex Rivera, your overall neuromuscular score of 80/100 indicates a solid baseline for athletic performance, though the data set from this follow-up scan is notably incomplete. Your left-side balance sway scored an 80/100, which is slightly above average for a 34-year-old male with one year of training, suggesting good unilateral stability and proprioceptive control on that side. However, the lack of right-side balance data prevents a crucial asymmetry analysis, which is vital for identifying injury risks and ensuring balanced power transfer during dynamic athletic movements. Furthermore, with zero attempts recorded for reaction time and missing steadiness metrics, we cannot evaluate your central nervous system's processing speed or motor unit recruitment efficiency. To fully optimize your athletic performance and tailor your 5-day-a-week training regimen, it is imperative to complete a full scan to capture these missing bilateral and cognitive-motor metrics. The athlete displays outstanding neuromuscular control and single-leg stability on both sides with no notable asymmetries. The absence of significant compensations, such as hip drop or arm flailing, indicates a highly refined balance system. The algorithmic score underestimates his actual stability and warrants a positive adjustment. Compensations observed: Minor ankle micro-adjustments on the left leg.

Neuromuscular Breakdown

80

Balance

Balance Score

80/100

Stable

Advanced Analytics

Key Metric Insights

1

The severe 92.7% asymmetry in thoracic rotation (33 degrees left vs. 90 degrees right) is the most critical limiting factor for rotational power and injury prevention.

2

An excellent VO2max of 49.9 ml/kg/min and a resting heart rate of 58 bpm provide a robust aerobic foundation for sustained athletic performance and rapid recovery.

3

Structural compensations, including a posterior pelvic tilt (182.3 degrees) and bilateral knee hyperextension, threaten to compromise force absorption and lower-body explosive power transfer.

4

Strength metrics (Grade F) are currently invalid due to telemetry anomalies recording 1kg loads, necessitating immediate recalibration and retesting to establish true force production baselines.

Recovery & Fatigue

76Recovery Readiness

A Recovery Readiness score of 76/100 paired with a Cardio Readiness of 89/100 indicates a solid systemic recovery state, though the abnormally high resting respiratory rate of 28 bpm warrants monitoring for acute physiological stress.

With an N/A Fatigue Index and severe anomalies in the strength telemetry recording 1kg loads, true neuromuscular fatigue resistance cannot be accurately assessed and requires retesting with appropriate loads.

Movement Quality

83

/100

B+Posture
B+Mobility
FStrength
D+Power
B+Neuro

Compensation Chains

Thoracic rotation asymmetry → Compensatory lumbar rotation → Uneven loading during bilateral lifts

Restricted shoulder reach → Limited overhead position → Overhead squat compensation → Injury risk in pressing

Your overall movement quality is solid with a Movement Complexity of 83/100, but it is hindered by a swayback posture, a 182.3-degree posterior pelvic tilt, and significant bilateral knee hyperextension. These structural compensations, combined with limited shoulder flexion overhead, will leak power and increase joint stress during high-impact athletic performance.

Bilateral Asymmetry

33.4

Asymmetry Index

Thigh circumference3.1% diff
22.7
22
← LeftRight →
Hamstring (SLR)4.4% diff
79.5
83.1
← LeftRight →
Thoracic rotation92.7% diff
33
90
← LeftRight →

The Asymmetry Index of 33.4/100 highlights a severe 92.7% difference in thoracic rotation (33 degrees left versus 90 degrees right), which drastically impairs rotational power and upper-body kinetic chain efficiency. While lower-body asymmetries are mild, addressing this severe thoracic restriction is critical to preventing compensatory shoulder or lower back injuries during dynamic athletic movements.

Training Efficiency

100

/100

Excellent

Based on 1 year of training

A Training Age Efficiency score of 100/100 demonstrates outstanding progress for just one year of consistent 5-day-a-week training. You have rapidly developed a strong aerobic base and functional mobility, effectively maximizing your initial physiological adaptation phase.

Movement Risk Assessment

57

/100 risk score

Moderate risk — some imbalances detected. Corrective work recommended alongside training.

Risk Flags

highThoracic Spine and Shoulders

Shoulder impingement and lower back compensation during overhead or rotational movements due to severe thoracic rotation asymmetry (33° L vs 90° R) and poor bilateral shoulder reach.

Implement targeted thoracic mobility drills focusing on left-side rotation, and stretch the posterior shoulder capsule to improve internal rotation.

moderateLumbar Spine and Pelvis

Reduced spinal shock absorption and increased risk of lower back pain during high-impact landings due to flat back posture, posterior pelvic tilt (182.3°), and knee hyperextension.

Stretch the hamstrings, strengthen the hip flexors, and practice maintaining a neutral pelvis and slight knee bend during static stance and dynamic landings.

moderateKnees

Patellofemoral pain or ligament strain due to knee valgus observed during overhead squats combined with stiff, force-dominant jump landings.

Strengthen the gluteus medius to improve hip abduction/external rotation control, and incorporate low-level plyometrics focusing on soft, hip-dominant landings.

Sport Readiness

How prepared your profile is for each sport, based on all scan data.

Csoccer
45
Cswimming
40
Dmma
35
Dcrossfit
35
Dbasketball
35
Dtennis
30
Dsprinting
30
Dpowerlifting
25
Ffootball
20
Frugby
15

Training Program

Phase: Foundational Athletic Power & Corrective Phase
Duration: 4 weeks
Frequency: 5x/week

Day 1 — Lower Body Strength & Landing Mechanics

1

Knee-to-Wall Ankle Mobilization

3 sets × 10 per leg

Keep heel flat on the floor. Drive knee forward over the 2nd/3rd toe to improve dorsiflexion.

2

Banded Lateral Walks

3 sets × 15 per side

Band around knees. Stay in a quarter squat, push knees out against the band to activate glute medius.

3

Box Jumps

4 sets × 4

Focus entirely on a soft, silent landing. Stick the landing in a strong athletic stance with zero knee valgus.

4

Goblet Squat

3 sets × 10-12

Elevate heels slightly if needed to maintain upright torso. Cue 'knees out' to prevent medial collapse.

5

Romanian Deadlift (RDL)

3 sets × 8-10

Focus on pushing hips back (hinging) rather than bending knees. Stretch the hamstrings and maintain a neutral spine.

6

Pallof Press

3 sets × 12 per side

Anti-rotation core stability. Keep pelvis neutral, do not let the lower back arch.

Day 2 — Upper Body & Thoracic Mobility

1

Quadruped T-Spine Rotation

3 sets × 8 per side

Perform 10-12 reps on the left side to address the severe asymmetry. Exhale on rotation.

2

Prone Y-Raises

3 sets × 12

Lie face down, lift arms in a 'Y' shape. Focus on lower trap activation and improving shoulder flexion.

3

Dumbbell Floor Press

3 sets × 10

Floor limits range of motion to protect shoulders from impingement while building horizontal pushing strength.

4

Single-Arm Dumbbell Row

3 sets × 10 per side

Keep torso parallel to the ground. Pull elbow to hip to engage lats and stabilize the scapula.

5

Half-Kneeling Landmine Press

3 sets × 8 per side

Safer vertical pressing alternative. Keep ribs down and pelvis tucked (neutral) to avoid swayback compensation.

6

Dead Bug

3 sets × 10 per side

Maintain lower back contact with the floor to build lumbopelvic control and correct posterior pelvic tilt.

Day 3 — Active Recovery, Core & Correctives

1

90/90 Hip Stretch

2 sets × 60s hold per side

Focus on deep breathing and opening up the hip capsules.

2

Half-Kneeling Hip Flexor Isometrics

3 sets × 10s holds

Drive back knee forward into the ground without moving. Strengthens underactive hip flexors to correct swayback.

3

Open Book Stretch

3 sets × 10 per side

Focus on opening the chest and rotating through the upper back, especially toward the left.

4

Bird Dog

3 sets × 10 per side

Move slowly. Do not let the lower back arch or pelvis twist. Core stability is the priority.

5

Active Straight Leg Raise

2 sets × 15 per leg

Keep non-working leg flat. Focus on hip dissociation without letting the pelvis tuck under.

Day 4 — Athletic Power & Lower Body

1

Pogo Jumps

3 sets × 15 seconds

Rapid response plyometrics. Stiff ankles, minimal ground contact time to improve elastic energy transfer.

2

Altitude Drops (Drop Squats)

3 sets × 5

Step off a low box and snap into an athletic stance. Focus on rapid force absorption and preventing stiff landings.

3

Bulgarian Split Squat

3 sets × 8 per side

Unilateral strength. Keep front knee tracking over toes, avoid valgus collapse.

4

Glute Bridge with Adductor Squeeze

3 sets × 15

Squeeze a yoga block or pad between knees. Drive through heels to activate glute max without hamstring dominance.

5

RKC Plank

3 sets × 30 seconds

Maximum tension. Squeeze glutes and brace core. Actively pull elbows to toes to engage anterior core.

Day 5 — Upper Body & Trunk Integration

1

Wall Angels

3 sets × 10

Keep lower back, upper back, and head against the wall. Slide arms up to improve shoulder flexion and T-spine mobility.

2

Inverted Row

3 sets × 10-12

Squeeze shoulder blades together. Keep body in a straight line, avoiding hip sag.

3

Push-ups

3 sets × AMRAP (leave 2 in tank)

Elevate hands on a bench if needed to maintain a perfectly neutral spine. Do not let hips drop (swayback).

4

Farmer's Carry

3 sets × 40 meters

Heavy dumbbells. Walk tall, chest up, ribs down. Resists lateral flexion and builds postural endurance.

5

Hanging Knee Raises

3 sets × 10-12

Strict control, no swinging. Strengthens hip flexors and lower core to help correct pelvic tilt.

Priority Action Plan

1

Thoracic Spine & Shoulders

Quadruped T-Spine Rotations & Wall Angels to address severe left-side restriction and poor overhead mobility.

Daily — Target: Symmetrical T-spine rotation (>70 degrees bilaterally) and improved shoulder reach.

2

Landing Mechanics

Altitude drops and Box Jumps focusing on soft, silent landings with proper hip/knee/ankle flexion.

2x per week — Target: Eliminate stiff landings and reduce time to takeoff in jump metrics.

3

Swayback Posture

Half-kneeling hip flexor isometrics and strict core bracing (Dead Bugs, RKC Planks).

3x per week — Target: Restore neutral resting pelvic tilt and eliminate knee hyperextension in stance.

4

Ankle Mobility

Knee-to-wall dorsiflexion mobilizations.

Daily — Target: Eliminate heel lift during deep squats.

5

Glute Activation

Banded lateral walks and cueing 'knees out' during all squatting/landing movements.

During all warm-ups — Target: Zero knee valgus observed during overhead squats and jump landings.

Nutrition & Diet Plan

Calorie summary

1543

BMR

2121

TDEE

2121

Target

Maintenance

Macros

  • Protein 104g(20%)
  • Carbs 280g(53%)
  • Fat 65g(28%)

Activity level

×1.38

SedentaryModerateActiveVery activeExtreme

AI narrative

Welcome back, Alex Rivera, for your follow-up assessment. At 65kg with a solid body fat percentage of 16.5% and excellent symmetry, your baseline is primed for your goal of maximizing athletic performance. Based on your lightly active daily routine and your 5 days per week training schedule, your Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR) sits at 1543 kcal/day. Factoring in your activity level, your Total Daily Energy Expenditure (TDEE) is 2121 kcal/day. To optimize your performance and recovery without unwanted weight gain, we are targeting a maintenance intake of exactly 2121 kcal/day (+0 kcal vs TDEE).

To fuel your workouts and maintain your 54.3kg of lean mass, we have precisely structured your macronutrients. Carbohydrates will be your primary energy source, set at 280 g/day (52.8% of calories). This ensures your glycogen stores remain full for high-intensity efforts, utilizing complex sources like oats, rice, and sweet potatoes. Protein is set at 104 g/day (19.6% of calories) to facilitate muscle repair, sourced from lean chicken, whey, and Greek yogurt. Finally, fat is calculated at 65 g/day (27.6% of calories) to support hormonal balance and joint health, incorporating nutrient-dense foods like avocados, walnuts, and olive oil.

Nutrient timing and hydration are critical for a 5-day training week. Aim to consume a carbohydrate-rich meal, like your morning oats and banana, about 1-2 hours pre-workout to provide sustained energy. Post-workout, prioritize a fast-digesting protein and carbohydrate combination—such as whey protein and rice cakes—within 45 minutes to kickstart recovery. Hydration should not be overlooked; aim for at least 3 liters of water daily, adding an electrolyte supplement on your most intense training days. Additionally, you might consider a daily 5g dose of creatine monohydrate to further enhance explosive power and overall athletic performance.

Suggested daily diet

Breakfast (Pre-Workout)

7:00 AM
  • 80g Rolled Oats
  • 240ml Unsweetened Almond Milk
  • 1 medium Banana
  • 15g Natural Peanut Butter
520 kcalP 16gC 82gF 14g

Post-Workout Snack

10:00 AM
  • 20g Whey Protein Isolate
  • 2 Plain Rice Cakes
  • 1 medium Apple
245 kcalP 17gC 42gF 1g

Lunch

1:00 PM
  • 120g Chicken Breast (raw weight)
  • 80g White Rice (dry weight)
  • 100g Steamed Broccoli
  • 10g Extra Virgin Olive Oil
556 kcalP 36gC 71gF 13g

Afternoon Snack

4:00 PM
  • 150g Non-fat Plain Greek Yogurt
  • 100g Fresh Blueberries
  • 20g Raw Walnuts
277 kcalP 19gC 23gF 13g

Dinner

7:30 PM
  • 150g Cooked Lentils
  • 120g Baked Sweet Potato
  • 100g Sliced Avocado
  • 5g Olive Oil (for cooking)
523 kcalP 16gC 62gF 24g
Daily total
2121 kcalP 104gC 280gF 65g

Recommended rescan in

4 weeks

Target: May 14, 2026

Allan's Advice

### Allan's Advice Alex Rivera Alex Rivera, to optimize your athletic performance, we first need to address a few data collection issues to ensure your programming is accurate. For your next scan, please wear form-fitting clothing; the baggy clothes caused the optical sensors to fail, though photo review estimates your body fat around 14.5%. With a lean mass of 54.3kg and a "below average" muscle mass rating, your primary nutritional and training focus should be on building functional muscle to improve your power-to-weight ratio. Additionally, your strength telemetry recorded 1kg loads and your vitals showed a 23% confidence resting heart rate with an abnormally high respiratory rate of 28 bpm. Recalibrate your equipment, retest your strength with standard loads, and take a full 60-second vitals scan while completely still to establish a true baseline. From a structural standpoint, your posture reveals a swayback alignment characterized by a 182.3° posterior pelvic tilt, flattened spinal curves, and noticeable knee hyperextension. This alignment inhibits explosive lower-body power and sprinting mechanics. To correct this, you need to stretch your posterior chain—specifically your hamstrings—and strengthen your underactive hip flexors. Incorporate exercises like psoas marches, active straight leg raises with a focus on keeping the lower back pinned to the floor, and core stabilization drills to prevent the pelvic rotation we observed during your hamstring mobility tests. Your mobility data highlights significant upper-body restrictions that will hinder dynamic athletic movements. You have a severe thoracic rotation asymmetry, achieving only 33° on your left side compared to 90° on your right, alongside poor shoulder reach scores (1/3 bilaterally) due to limited internal rotation. Implement daily left-sided thoracic "open books" or windmills, and use sleeper stretches to improve shoulder internal rotation. This upper-body tightness is directly causing the elbow flexion and forward trunk lean seen in your overhead squat (LLM score 48/100), so improving thoracic and shoulder mobility is non-negotiable for overhead stability. To translate your strength into athletic performance, we must address your power output. Your best vertical jump of 32cm and low Reactive Strength Index (1.07) are bottlenecked by a sluggish 1449ms time to takeoff. You have a force-dominant profile but struggle with the amortization phase—the transition between absorbing and producing force. Add rapid-response plyometrics to your 5-day routine, such as pogo jumps, low box drop jumps, and continuous broad jumps. Focus on an aggressive, full posterior arm swing during the dip and cue a "soft" landing by sitting back into your hips to better distribute impact forces. Finally, refine your lower-body movement mechanics. During your deep squats, we noticed heel lift and slight knee valgus (knees caving in). Before adding heavy loads, practice your squats with the cues "keep heels glued to the floor" and "drive knees out over the toes" to ensure proper glute activation. By addressing these foundational mobility asymmetries, correcting your swayback posture, and shifting your power training to focus on elastic energy transfer, you will build a much more resilient and explosive athletic base.